#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance pro
#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance software
#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance Bluetooth

Now, it's true that the Dell has some additional features (higher-end video and six USB ports instead of three, for example), but it also weighs nearly two pounds more and is much chunkier (1.69-in. Once I did that, though, and tricked out the M1710 with only those extras it had to have to compete with the MacBook Pro, I was surprised to see the Dell come in at a whopping $3,459, some $650 more than the Apple product.

#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance software

In short, crap software will be crap on any machine, whether it is a PC or a Mac.

#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance pro

To get a 2.33-GHz Core 2 Duo processor (a 2.4-GHz version isn't available yet), you have to move up to Dell's more expensive XPS M1710 with Vista Home Premium. Badly-written applications randomly crashing, (Adobe Premiere Pro CC, Photoshop CC, Lightroom CC, and other third-party apps) and Adobe compatibility issues with the latest Mac OS, to name a few. It's hard to do since the price of the Windows PCs vary widely depending on the motherboard. Users should bear in mind, however, that not everyone needs an all-around app or powerful photo editor. Is there a better alternative In terms of an all-round image editing app or photo editor, no: Photoshop is the best.

I often get asked to do price/performance comparisons on the Mac vs PC. This version of Photoshop runs on Mac, version 10.12 or later (Sierra). We plan to add Maya results in a few days but Motion is Mac only so we won't be including it in this report. I was a little surprised to find that Dell's Inspiron line doesn't currently offer processing power equaling that of the MacBook Pro. Two examples of applications that involve the GPU are Maya and Motion. (See Apple's site for the complete MacBook Pro technical specifications.) One-year warranty (upgradeable to three years).

#Mac vs pc for photoshop performance Bluetooth

Bluetooth 2.0+EDR, ExpressCard/34 card slot.

I started my research with top-of-the-line notebooks - I spent an hour on Dell's site trying to find the cheapest notebook that offered everything Apple's $2,799 MacBook Pro 17 provides. So there's one answer to the question of whether Macs or Windows represent a better value: If one of those 'in between' PCs suits your needs best, you'd be paying an unnecessary premium to get a Mac instead. And in those niches, they represent very good values. On the other hand, if you search the Windows side first, you'll quickly discover machines that - in features and price - fit in between the Mac SKUs. But if you're talking name-brand hardware, that's just no longer the case. Only a few years ago, it seemed like a no-brainer that Windows hardware was much cheaper. If you start with Apple's relatively short list of SKUs (three or four model variations for each of its lines, such as MacBook Pro, MacBook and iMac) and then look for comparable Windows machines, you'll find that Apple bests the competition in some ways and not in others, but the pricing overall is surprisingly on par. For those of you who are left, what I have found in my research is that neither side has a lock on good value.